I see the logic, but Dresser was prob countin on bonus from Zavatsky.

No disrespect to Zach, but that's where I thought we lost the match, not getting bonus at all there.

Penalty point being in the past of course.

[Post edited by hokie576 at 01/09/2016 10:12PM]

(In response to this post by dallasvt)

Posted: 01/09/2016 at 10:06PM

PREV NEXT REPLY

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

Do we have anyone to wrestle 197? ** -- Hokiepac 01/09/2016 9:32PM

I would have considered bumping Zavatsky up and wrestling Gabel at 184. -- dallasvt 01/09/2016 10:01PM

I see the logic, but Dresser was prob countin on bonus from Zavatsky. -- hokie576 01/09/2016 10:06PM

Tough to get as much bonus as you get by winning another bout. ** -- dallasvt 01/09/2016 10:15PM

Let me add, I have no Idea if Zavatsky would have had a chance. I tend to -- dallasvt 01/09/2016 10:19PM

Bumped Gabel up ** -- HealthHokie 01/09/2016 9:45PM

Gabel is gonna go... ** -- RRHokie90 01/09/2016 9:44PM

I see the logic, but Dresser was prob countin on bonus from Zavatsky.

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors