MOST reviews of all the oo's have Sean Conerly numeral uno as oo7 goes. Granted.

Most masculine. Scores very high on sex appeal with the wimminz species.
Very hands-on. Gritty/gamey. Nothing P.C. or pussy-cat need apply here.
Sean went to a feminist rally and left with his shirt freshly ironed.
Highlander bonus points and a physically BIG stature Bond too.
-------------------------------------------------
Then Rog' Moore was mo' Glib. Mo' pithy. Played a less hands-on Bond;
with more satire/humor. Not as strict. Not as dark. Tho' pretty decent...

Then a lotta other Bond's did anywhere between C--- and B+++ work.
A mixed bag. Some better or lessor at this/that...

Then however we see James Blonde. Or Daniel Craig.
Who the reviews said is actually *the closest* (or best) portrayal of oo7
when you see/read what was really in Ian Fleming's bookish double-oh make.
=========================
So, is Daniel really the closest/most accurate Bond?
Does this make Daniel the beta behind the Alpha-Sean? Or even #1?

(or for that matter, do you favor: Moore, Hutton, Pierce, or George best of all?)



TIA!
♂️🍸♂️
b.street