Out of curiosity, who would you consider to be an "average ACC player?"
I ask because not everyone in the ACC can be above average or a great player. In terms of who qualifies as an ACC caliber player, I would say that tag should go to any player who is considered to be average or above in terms of skill.
I would consider PJ to be an "average ACC player" at best. PJ's problem is he really doesn't fit any of the 5 positions. His height suggests he should be either a SG or SF. While his weight and feet suggests he should be a PF or maybe a C. At least I believe that has limited his development as a player while at VT.
|
(
In response to this post by AnotherTechW)
Posted: 04/22/2020 at 09:21AM