All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

The Lounge Board

133743Hokie

Joined: 10/07/1999 Posts: 36643
Likes: 11723


Course is a little soft. Tee shot landed in fairway, bounced forward about


3 or 4 feet on one hop, then rolled 6 or 8 inches and came to rest in an existing pitch mark in the fairway. He initially argued that his ball landed there and was embedded do he was due relief. On course TV reporter told him it landed further back and bounced forward. So he then said that when it bounced forward it imbedef on the hop. Rules official wasn't buying it and says it's an existing pitch mark. Do now he argues that it enlarged the existing pitch mark when it landed. Rules official viewed TV tape and says no. After several more minutes of arguing to no avail he asks for a second opinion.

Second rules official arrives. Agrees with first official. Kuchar continues to argue. Finally after 10+ minutes he finally plays it, still argung his point.

As officials tried to tell him, there is no way that ball made any indentation on the low short hop and no way it enlarged the existing dimple.

(In response to this post by JoesterVT)

Posted: 05/30/2019 at 7:22PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  Ever met Colin Montgomerie? -- typed by ben 05/31/2019 07:17AM
  Never got to meet Colin but he seemed pretty genuine ** -- Technocrat 05/31/2019 08:39AM
  Kuchar is a douchebag..... -- 2hhoop3 05/30/2019 8:01PM
  If you ain't cheatin' you ain't tryin'.** -- MikeVT85 05/30/2019 7:03PM
  People should replace their divots. -- Newt 05/30/2019 7:53PM
  Wasn't a divot but a ball mark ** -- 133743Hokie 05/30/2019 9:07PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307