Yeah, just Wiki'ed it, pushes it out to 2050, I'm amazed...

but I suppose the trick here is not to push the farther and faster boundaries, with exponential cost increases but go "low tech" (not really, when considering IT but...) slow(er) and steady works better sometime.

In response to this post by F4EHokie

Posted: 03/17/2019 at 12:30PM

For those following the 737 Max accident - on OpEd by a long time friend of -- B777Fr8Dog 03/17/2019 11:53AM

In summary we are asking the machines to take on the job of the human -- vt_mughal 03/17/2019 3:38PM

Wouldn't say 'never,' just maybe not in your lifetime if you're already old -- Synaesthesia 03/18/2019 09:17AM

Had the damnedest time trying to teach my 15yo to use a manual can opener 😞 ** -- B777Fr8Dog 03/17/2019 3:53PM

Kinda says the same thing the F-18 guys told me a few years ago............ -- F4EHokie 03/17/2019 12:08PM

Saw a picture of an F-4 being tested... in 1956! -- `lag 03/17/2019 12:17PM

I love their song "Love Shack" ** -- TexasGobbler 03/17/2019 12:39PM

So yeah, when I google "B-52s" what do I get all the hits on? -- `lag 03/17/2019 12:45PM

I think it was ‘58. First flight of the P-3 was a yr later. They are -- B777Fr8Dog 03/17/2019 12:27PM

This was when they were developing it... -- `lag 03/17/2019 12:33PM

And the B-52 is going to get re-engined......................... -- F4EHokie 03/17/2019 12:21PM

Yeah, just Wiki'ed it, pushes it out to 2050, I'm amazed... -- `lag 03/17/2019 12:30PM

Yeah, just Wiki'ed it, pushes it out to 2050, I'm amazed...

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors