All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

The Lounge Board

81_Hokie

Joined: 03/16/2005 Posts: 3159
Likes: 1488


Wow, if that's really how it happened...


basically the Uber vehicle saw something it couldn't identify, then thought it did, then when it was too late decided to give control back to the human? It seems like the same thing could have happened if it was any larger, slower moving object, like a car limping along with a flat tire or road workers putting out cones or COUNTLESS other scenarios. To not have the overarching safety critical rule of "DON'T HIT STUFF" seems negligent. The car should always know its own speed and and stopping distance. If you are traveling at 45 mph and approaching an object going 2 mph and it's not accelerating, when you get to that distance put on the brakes!!! You avoid hitting an unknown object that might be people, a stroller, a construction crew and the worst that happens is you get rear ended in your known object... the car with structure and airbags. Heck, flash brake lights before you actually apply the brakes. Yes, I don't think negligent is too strong a word here, if the article is accurate.

(In response to this post by VaAkita)

Posted: 08/30/2018 at 11:13AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Franken algorithms -- VaAkita 08/30/2018 10:17AM
  Video on how complex algorithms are made -- HokieDevil 08/31/2018 08:32AM
  Wow, if that's really how it happened... -- 81_Hokie 08/30/2018 11:13AM
  That's not exactly right -- Beerman 08/30/2018 1:03PM
  Yes and no... -- 81_Hokie 08/30/2018 2:10PM
  For the particular scenario ... -- Beerman 08/30/2018 2:18PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307