trying to compare a random act of violence by a student to a pattern of abuse perpetrated by an employee over the course of decades that was at best completely unnoticed and at worst ignored for the sake of the football program is about as irrational as one can be. If VT had employed a serial killer who had murdered people for decades without consequence then you might have a point.

As it is you come across as a prime example of what some people see is STILL the problem at Penn State. Excuses, apologists, faulty comparisons... anything to distract and redirect from the completely inexcusable failure on the part of the Penn State administration and football program. If you want people to believe that the culture of Penn State that allowed Sandusky to thrive has changed, you've picked a poor way to go about it.