At that point, it's up to the coaches to do a cost/benefit

What do we lose in the short term by replacing JJ with Willis or Hooker? What do we gain in the long term? How likely is it that each one hits their ceiling? Or at the least, how likely is it that they overtake JJ (and how much will they likely overtake JJ by?).

There are a ton of factors that go into the calculus of selecting a starting QB. But the #1 factor really has to be, who can win NOW? Because all this about upside is just projecting. What if the guy with the most upside doesn't improve (IE: Dwayne Lawson, Ike Whittaker)? What if it turns out that they're an even bigger turnover machine?

(In response to this post by hokieboozer)

Posted: 05/03/2018 at 3:28PM

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

At that point, it's up to the coaches to do a cost/benefit

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors