All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

VTHokie2000

Joined: 01/01/2005 Posts: 33818
Likes: 12458


Is what Nike did any different than what happened to Reggie Bush's family?


According to NCAA eligibility rules, in order for a HS student to be eligible to play DI sports, that HS student must remain an "amateur." If a company is sponsoring an athlete and his/her family, then is that athlete still an "amateur?" The NCAA says the following points determines whether someone is an "amateur" or "professional."

1. Signing a contract with a professional team
2. Playing with professionals
3. Participating in tryouts or practices with a professional team
4. Accepting payments or preferential benefits for playing sports
5. Accepting prize money above your expenses
6. Accepting benefits from an agent or prospective agent
7. Agreeing to be represented by an agent
8. Delaying your full-time college enrollment to play in organized sports competitions

FWIW the NCAA ruled that Jeremy Bloom was no longer an amateur and eligible to play football because of his sponsors in skiing. How is Nike sponsoring a HS basketball team and players/family members any different than Swix (makes ski wax) sponsoring Jeremy Bloom?

(In response to this post by Late 80s Hokie)

Link: NCAA


Posted: 03/22/2018 at 10:41AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
AAU, Nike and Bagley. -- IB4TECH 03/20/2018 8:14PM
  There is some good news -- UCHusky90 03/21/2018 08:56AM
  Bagley wouldn't be an amateur and would be ineligible... -- Mr. Touchdown 03/22/2018 9:34PM
  You do make valid points. -- VTHokie2000 03/22/2018 11:42AM
  In my mind, UNC by a long shot -- Hokie `04 03/23/2018 6:20PM
  TV loves them ** -- SoCloseHokie 03/22/2018 04:08AM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307