Virginia Tech Set for First Road Test

Share on your favorite social network:
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail to someoneGoogle+share on TumblrShare on Reddit



Virginia Tech will head to an unfamiliar state to take on an unfamiliar opponent. The Hokies have never played a football game in the state of Indiana, and they’ve never played the Purdue Boilermakers.

Purdue has struggled in recent years.

2008: 4-8
2009: 5-7
2010: 4-8
2011: 7-6
2012: 6-7
2013: 1-11
2014: 3-9

Darrell Hazell is in his third year as the Purdue head coach. He went 16-10 in two seasons at Kent State, including an 11-3 season in 2012.   He is a former assistant at Ohio State, Rutgers and West Virginia, and he is #4 on the hot seat on (As a comparison, Mike London is #2.)

That said, Purdue improved from 2013 to 2014, and on paper they will improve from 2014 to 2015. They return a ton of starters, including some multi-year starters. The obvious goal is to improve to five wins in 2015, with a bowl game being the goal in 2016.

The season got off to a bad start with a 41-31 loss at Marshall. Purdue’s defense didn’t play as poorly as the score might indicate, as the Thundering Herd returned two interceptions for touchdowns. The Boilermakers rebounded to defeat Indiana State 38-14 last weekend.


The Purdue Offense

Here’s a look at the Purdue starting lineup…

WR Dominique Young (6-3, 205, Jr.): 2 career starts
WR DeAngelo Yancey (6-2, 223, Jr.): 15 career starts
LT David Hedelin (6-4, 298, Sr.): 8 career starts
LG Jason King (6-4, 305, Jr.): 19 career starts
C Robert Kugler (6-3, 294, r-Sr.): 33 career starts
RG Jordan Roos (6-4, 312, Jr.): 20 career starts
RT Cameron Cermin (6-5, 301, Jr.): 10 career starts
TE Jordan Jurasevich (6-3, 250, r-Sr.): 0 career starts
WR Danny Anthrop (6-0, 186, Sr.): 11 career starts
QB Austin Appleby (6-5, 239, Jr.): 9 career starts
RB DJ Knox (5-7, 197, So.): 2 career starts

The Boilermakers have a decent amount of experience, and in fact they have a lot of experience on the interior part of the offensive line.

Quarterback Austin Appleby is a talented player who is a threat with his legs in the read option. His arm is certainly good enough, and he certainly has the size. However, he has struggled with turnovers. He threw four interceptions in Purdue’s 41-31 loss at Marshall, including two that were returned for touchdowns.

He also struggled with turnovers a year ago, throwing 11 picks in 272 pass attempts, compared with just 10 touchdowns. He completed just 52.9% of his passes. Appleby is an improved player this year, and he has more weapons around him, but he is still a question mark when it comes to turnovers.

It’s still early, but Purdue’s top offensive weapon so far has been sophomore tailback DJ Knox. Knox leads the team in rushing yards and pass receptions.

Rushing: 38 carries, 193 yards, 5.1 ypc, 96.5 ypg
Receiving: 8 catches, 48 yards

In the season opener at Marshall, Knox ran for 102 yards and he also hauled in six receptions for 36 yards.

Knox has help in the form of Markell Jones (5-11, 207, Fr.). He’s a young player, but he enrolled in January and has made a major impact early in his career.

Marshall: 12 carries, 72 yards, 1 TD
Indiana State: 14 carries, 67 yards, 1 TD, 4 catches, 32 yards, 1 TD

Jones and Knox are a productive combination. The Boilermakers aren’t messing with the rotation, either. No other back has received more than one carry on the season. Austin Appleby has 24 carries from the quarterback position (90 gains, 28 lost, net 62). Look for those three guys to get the majority of the touches on Saturday.

On the whole, the Purdue running game is what we should be concerned with the most. The Boilermakers are averaging 217.5 yards per game on the ground, and 4.7 yards per carry. Virginia Tech has not been stellar against the run this year, particularly on the edge. The Hokies have to dial in on Saturday. If they can stop the running game, I don’t think Purdue has the ability to beat them on a consistent basis through the air.

As far as Purdue’s receivers go, Danny Anthrop is the most dangerous. He caught 38 passes for 616 yards a year ago before being injured in the ninth game of the season. Their other receivers have terrific size, but are still unproven at the college level.

Virginia Tech has shown a lot of Bear type fronts in the first two weeks of the season, even against Furman. I would expect Purdue to attack Virginia Tech’s defense on the edge in the run game. That is where the Hokies have been the most vulnerable in the first two games. Purdue offensive coordinator John Shoop and Tech defensive coordinator Bud Foster are familiar with each other. Shoop was the offensive coordinator at UNC from 2007 through 2011.

The Purdue Defense

Likewise, defensive coordinator Greg Hudson has some familiarity with Virginia Tech. From 2005 through 2009, he was the defensive coordinator at East Carolina. From 2010 through 2012, he was the defensive coordinator at Florida State. Here’s how his defenses have fared against the Hokies…

2007: 278 yards, 17 points
2008: 243 yards, 22 points
2009: 379 yards, 16 points
2010: 442 yards, 44 points
2012: 385 yards, 22 points
Average: 345.5 yards, 24.2 points

Outside of the Tyrod Taylor/Danny Coale/Jarrett Boykin/David Wilson/Ryan Williams/Darren Evans offense, the Hokies have never been able to get much going against a Greg Hudson defense. However, Hudson has yet to face Scot Loeffler and Tech’s new offensive staff.

Here’s a look at Purdue’s starting defense…

DT Jake Replogle (6-5, 275, Jr.): 14 career starts
NG Ryan Watson (6-2, 298, r-Sr.): 8 career starts
DE Evan Panfil (6-5, 262, Jr.): 3 career starts
RE Antoine Miles (6-3, 236, So.): 2 career starts
WLB Danny Ezechukwu (6-2, 246, So.): 8 career starts
MLB Ja’Whaun Bentley (6-2, 260, So.): 14 career starts
SLB Jimmy Herman (6-4, 230, Jr.): 11 career starts
CB Anthony Brown (5-11, 190, Sr.): 24 career starts
SS Leroy Clark (5-10, 190, Jr.): 6 career starts
FS Robert Gregory (6-1, 219, Jr.): 2 career starts
CB Frankie Williams (5-9, 190, r-Sr.): 29 career starts

Middle linebacker Ja’Whaun Bentley took over the starting position as a true freshman last year, making 76 tackles. He was a Freshman All-American in 2014. He’s a huge linebacker from DeMatha High School in Maryland, where he was part of the same class as Tech wide receiver Cam Phillips. Through two games in 2015, he leads the team with 15 tackles and he has 2.5 tackles for loss.

Bentley was the #24 player in the state of Maryland, and he was offered by Iowa, Maryland, Pitt, Rutgers, Syracuse, UVA and West Virginia. Though he’s much bigger than a traditional Virginia Tech mike, in hindsight I wish the Hokies had offered him, because had Tech landed him, there’s no doubt in my mind that he would be our starting mike right now, and we wouldn’t have to pull Carson Lydon’s redshirt.

As a true sophomore, Bentley is already a team captain for the Boilermakers. He’s a big hitter, and I think he’ll blitz the interior of the Tech offensive line quite a bit on Saturday.

Purdue’s defense has been very active so far this season. They have 21 tackles for loss through two games, along with six sacks. Defensive tackle Jake Replogle already has four tackles for loss on the season, while sophomore end Antoine Miles leads the team with two sacks. This is a very big front seven, and for the most part they aren’t lacking in experience.

Cornerback is the most experienced position on the field for the Boilermakers. Anthony Brown and Frankie Williams are both seniors who have been starting for a long time. Williams was a Second Team All-Big Ten player last season, while Brown broke up 10 passes. Brown played at Hillsborough High School in Tampa, FL. If that sounds familiar, it should. It’s where Dwayne Lawson went to high school.

Purdue’s defense will show multiple fronts, and I expect them to challenge Tech’s offensive line by bringing a variety of blitzes. With their experienced corners, the Boilermakers play a decent amount of man coverage. Against the inexperienced Brenden Motley, I expect them to mix up their coverages to try and confuse him, and you can bet that they’ll do some things that they haven’t shown on film.

Special Teams

Purdue’s top two playmakers – wide receiver Danny Anthrop and running back DJ Knox – serve as the team’s primary kickoff returners. They are good players, but if Joey Slye continues to kick the ball out of the back of the end zone, those two guys shouldn’t be a factor on special teams.

Trae Hart (5-10, 168, So.) and starting cornerback Frankie Williams serve as Purdue’s punt returners. Hart is extremely inexperienced, whereas Williams averaged 15.9 yards per return last season. Hart is listed as the #1 returner on the depth chart, but we could see both.

Senior placekicker Paul Griggs is just 2-of-5 on the season, and he’s missed all three of his attempts from a distance of 30 yards or more. Don’t let his early numbers fool you, though. Last season he was 16-of-20 with a long of 53 yards. He was the first Purdue kicker in history to make three field goals from beyond 50 yards in one season. He is very capable, and can be a major weapon for the Boilermakers.

Final Thoughts

Before the season began, I thought the Hokies would win this game by a few touchdowns. Now I’ll be happy if they come away with a victory, no matter the final margin. Tech will be starting a 207 pound walk-on middle linebacker who is coming off a torn ACL against a team that is averaging 217 yards per game on the ground, and the Hokies have struggled with their outside containment in their first two contests.

At quarterback, Brenden Motley got better as the game went along against Furman. However, he was late on two corner routes in the first half, and those passes likely would have been intercepted by FBS competition. Starting slow and coming alive in the second half is perfectly fine against FCS competition, but it probably won’t cut it on the road against a Big Ten team. Motley can’t afford to be late with his passes this week, nor can he stare down his primary receiver all game as he did against Furman. Purdue is not great, but they are certainly better than the Paladins. They are capable of making Tech pay for their mistakes.

Field position, red zone efficiency, and turnovers. It sounds cliché, but for the Hokies, those are the three keys to victory. If they can make Purdue drive the length of the field, convert their red zone trips into touchdowns and avoid turnovers, they should be able to leave West Lafayette with a win. Those are the three keys to the game, as far as I’m concerned.

I really don’t know what to expect this week, and until we see Brenden Motley play a game or two against FBS competition, this season is going to be very difficult to predict.

Chris’ Prediction: Virginia Tech 24, Purdue 20

Will Stewart’s Take: Chris’ rundown of Purdue doesn’t make me feel any better. They have a solid running game and an experienced defensive backfield. They have the right recipe for causing Tech’s offense and defense a lot of trouble.

Purdue also has a coaching staff and a program that probably views this as a launch point opportunity. 1-11 two years ago? Blech. 3-9 last year? Blech. 1-1 this year, with a chance to beat Virginia Tech and get momentum going for their first bowl game with the new staff? Hmmm, they probably have this one circled on their calendar as a chance to make a statement about where they’re headed.

While Virginia Tech is trying to figure out their quarterback and linebacker situations and keep things held together until Michael Brewer returns, Purdue has their eyes on bigger, program goals. The intangibles favor the Boilermakers, I believe.

The atmosphere shouldn’t be too fearsome. A look at the Purdue football ticket availability map (hope that link works for you, it was an awfully long, complex link) reveals a ton of available seats in 57,236-seat Ross–Ade Stadium.

To win this game, it is critical for the Hokies to avoid turnovers and to force at least a couple. Turnovers are always important, so I rarely talk about them, but I think it’s more important than most games to avoid coughing up the football. Give Brenden Motley throws he can make, and don’t put Dwayne Lawson, if he plays, in a position to make big mistakes.

We know that Motley can be accurate when he’s throwing against an FCS defense that gave the receivers plenty of room. How will he do against an FBS defense that will challenge him with tighter coverage and a little deception?

Defensively, the Hokies need to force third and long and pressure the quarterback, and force him into throwing interceptions. I think Purdue is going to have some success running the ball, so when the Hokies are able to stuff the run and force long-distance situations, they need to capitalize.

And special teams needs to provide an advantage. We already know Purdue won’t be returning any kickoffs (heh-heh, thank you, Joey Slye), so the Hokies need to gain a leg up here, pardon the pun. If Frank challenges Joey Slye to make a few long field goals — he’s got the leg for it — Slye needs to nail pretty much everyone that comes his way.

This one’s going to be very, very tight. I’ll continue to go with the Hokies this early in the season, and cross my fingers that they’ll respond well on the road, with this uptick in competition. But they are indeed facing some serious challenges at QB and linebacker.

Will’s Prediction: Virginia Tech 20, Purdue 17

Who will win the Virginia Tech-Purdue game?

  • Virginia Tech by 1-9 (37%, 724 Votes)
  • Virginia Tech by 10-19 (42%, 810 Votes)
  • Virginia Tech by 20+ (7%, 143 Votes)
  • Purdue by 1-9 (11%, 206 Votes)
  • Purdue by 10-19 (2%, 30 Votes)
  • Purdue by 20+ (0%, 7 Votes)
  • I dont know/no opinion (1%, 25 Votes)

Total Voters: 1,945

Loading ... Loading ...



Share on your favorite social network:
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail to someoneGoogle+share on TumblrShare on Reddit

25 Responses You are logged in as Test

  1. I could easily regret this statement but I have hard time seeing this game being close. Purdue may get some things going in the running game but they are going to struggle consistently moving the chains against the VT DL. I’d like to see less of the bear front and go with a more traditional 4-3 alignment to protect the edges and take advantage of VT’s strength on the DL to gum up the interior.

    VT’s offense may struggle with the passing game on the outside but should have success challenging the safeties with the TE’s. I also see VT being consistent enough in the run game to open up some opportunities in the passing game. I also think that VT will be pretty efficient in the red zone with the receiving weapons, the rejuvenation of the OL and Motely’s ability to run the ball.

    Add all of that together with the fact there will be virtually no home field advantage for Purdue and I see VT winning this one by 2-3 TD’s.

  2. I hope Lawson gets significant playing time. I don’t know that he is better than motley, but I want to see him develop to be ready for next year.

    Never heard of RE before. Same as SS DE?

  3. Who are the schmucks who don’t know or have no opinion? Why even vote? Good lord. As far as this game goes I see it being tighter than I am comfortable with but I think we win because they are just bad. Not necessarily that we light things up. I expect a dogfight when that easily should not be the case.

  4. I am more worried about the defense at this point. Who cares that the pre-season predictions said our defense would be great? What matters is how they actually play. And if Furman (for goodness sakes!!) can gash us off the edge, then what does that say about this defense? And how can losing Moto be anything but bad? If the back-up was better, then he would have been starting already!

    Bud better figure this out quick, or it will not matter if Motley can lead the offense to 27 points… Because we will lose 30-27.

  5. Motley rushes for 60+ on the ground and McMillan busts a big one, and I think we see Newsome and Stroman in the game for jet sweeps, and off of a play action jet sweep I think we get a huge gainer (think TE’s open up middle). They will probably try and be conservative on offense and we may struggle for picks, but young tackles may end up with Dadi and Ken getting sacks and strip fumbles. Hopefully we see more Shai on the ground and less of Trey Edmunds. Hokies 27-13 is my guess

  6. I actually think we will improve on defense with the new Mike linebacker. Moto wasn’t very good in my opinion and lacked speed and proper tackling techniques.

  7. I really don’t think this game will be close at all. I expect VT to win by at least 17 points. Our talent level far exceeds their level, and we will exploit their lack of speed. We should be able to run for at least 250 Yds in this game. Go Hokies

  8. The big picture is simple, Purdue is picked near or at the bottom of the BIG 10, they lost to Marshall ( who lost to Ohio last week ) we should win easily, and why is eveyone now thinking our D is a concern, when at the first of the year everyone was thinking this may be one of our best in years. Again let it play out, after Saturday we wil have a good idea of where we are going as a program, lose and it is not going to be pretty, and win and go forward and contnue to grow as a team.

    1. I agree with that score. I see us getting off to a slow start on the road (maybe even trailing at the half) and then coming alive in the second half with a strong running game in the 4th.

  9. Shoop came up with a really nice gameplan against Foster one of his last couple of years at UNC, maybe the 2011 game with Renner at QB. A lot of misdirection kept us on our heels the whole game. I don’t think Appleby is as good as Renner, hopefully he will make some mistakes.

    I appreciate you included the # of starts per starter, it helps more than knowing their school year. Bentley, for instance, is a Soph but he’s quite experienced.

  10. Based upon every conceivable objective metric, VT should win this game easily. However, this is just the type of game that I could see VT losing. Road game, uninspiring opponent, new QB, LB issues, Beamer question marks etc…..I suspect Purdue will be highly motivated for this game.

  11. I am going to Motley the credit he deserves, he will play great and do his job. The defense is the one I worry about.

  12. Currently, I don’t think losing our MLB is a huge deal. It’s not like he is/was making 10 tackles a game. Losing Chuck Clark would be that kind of scenerio. I dont think defensively we will be much different
    Offensively, I believe this is a different story. There is a big difference between Brewer and Motley. I hope Motley continues to improve and take control of the offense.

    1. Losing the MLB is a big deal. Losing Motu is not cause he was not playing well anyway. He would be a good back-up if we had a solid starter.

Comments are closed.