You can't really look only at number of wins. Moir coached 11 seasons, but fewer games were played per season back then, as well. Seth is only 58 or so behind Moir, after fewer seasons at the helm, which SOUNDS great, but he also was only slightly behind in alltime losses. I believe you need to look at win % to get a better idea of how our coaches perform(ed).
-Seth was at .592 before the season.
-Moir finished at .642 - Certainly better. And the Metro was no slouch.
-His predecessor, Don Devoe finished .662 after his 5 seasons.
-Chuck Noe was .681 after his 7 seasons, 1955-1962
Anyone better than that was pre-1920
Seth certainly has succeeded as a program builder, but I worry he has peaked, and is NOT a program changer ... i.e. getting them to the "next level".