Exactly my point. If the ACC is so weak, they didn't need to keep the non-con patsy's on the schedule because WFU, BC, Duke, et. al. offer enough to go around (in-conference). So why not increase the conference games and schedule more match-ups with VT, UNC, Pitt, etc..? To me it seems a bit disingenuous to claim the ACC is too weak, then refuse to increase the conference schedule... unless you're scheduling strictly BCS level non-con games.
Also, comparing WFU to Chas. So. is ... well... hard to take serious.